<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wave of the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stoss.ca/wp/2009/wave-of-the-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2009/wave-of-the-future</link>
	<description>The Musings of a Techie Canuck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2009/wave-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-26281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=282#comment-26281</guid>
		<description>P.S. I still have 6 or 7 invites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. I still have 6 or 7 invites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2009/wave-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-26280</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=282#comment-26280</guid>
		<description>Stoss,

random thoughts ...

I installed the server (or a mockup, it&#039;s not clear exactly what it is) at home, and took a peek at what people were talking about on the forums (ok, ok, &quot;fora&quot;). It looks like the idea is that a company could install their own Wave server and hook it to the net or keep it completely in-house. I can&#039;t comment on what kind of provision has been made by Google so far in the hooked-up-to-the-net scenario to keep purely in-house exchanges on the local server whilst allowing exchanges with the outside world. Not being an expert in the domain, for all I know this is covered by Java / networking / internet protocol policies. 

On the wow-everyone-sees-my-every-keystroke point, that makes me chuckle. 1 keystroke = 1 &quot;blip&quot; (their very cute term) which is an XML doc. It&#039;s not a huge XML doc (compared to x10 MB XML docs with insane namespaces I&#039;ve had to handle in the past, etc) but it&#039;s still a factor of ~200 (random guess, can&#039;t be bothered to check right now) chars in the XML to the one keystroke represented. I know that broadband is a reality in 99% of the places that matter (if you don&#039;t have broadband, you obviously don&#039;t matter, pshaw) but the old fart in me still balks at the wastefulness. Oh well. I guess it&#039;s pretty meaningless when you consider that 99% of all bandwidth use is kids on myspace with their &quot;mood=wish my mom would die&quot; and porn.

There, random thoughts. Must GBTW. Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoss,</p>
<p>random thoughts &#8230;</p>
<p>I installed the server (or a mockup, it&#8217;s not clear exactly what it is) at home, and took a peek at what people were talking about on the forums (ok, ok, &#8220;fora&#8221;). It looks like the idea is that a company could install their own Wave server and hook it to the net or keep it completely in-house. I can&#8217;t comment on what kind of provision has been made by Google so far in the hooked-up-to-the-net scenario to keep purely in-house exchanges on the local server whilst allowing exchanges with the outside world. Not being an expert in the domain, for all I know this is covered by Java / networking / internet protocol policies. </p>
<p>On the wow-everyone-sees-my-every-keystroke point, that makes me chuckle. 1 keystroke = 1 &#8220;blip&#8221; (their very cute term) which is an XML doc. It&#8217;s not a huge XML doc (compared to x10 MB XML docs with insane namespaces I&#8217;ve had to handle in the past, etc) but it&#8217;s still a factor of ~200 (random guess, can&#8217;t be bothered to check right now) chars in the XML to the one keystroke represented. I know that broadband is a reality in 99% of the places that matter (if you don&#8217;t have broadband, you obviously don&#8217;t matter, pshaw) but the old fart in me still balks at the wastefulness. Oh well. I guess it&#8217;s pretty meaningless when you consider that 99% of all bandwidth use is kids on myspace with their &#8220;mood=wish my mom would die&#8221; and porn.</p>
<p>There, random thoughts. Must GBTW. Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoss</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2009/wave-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-25611</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=282#comment-25611</guid>
		<description>BTW: I regret to say I do not have invites at this time. However, send me a note or post here and I will out you on my list when/if I do get them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: I regret to say I do not have invites at this time. However, send me a note or post here and I will out you on my list when/if I do get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

