<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Meat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat</link>
	<description>The Musings of a Techie Canuck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blondheretic</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>blondheretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s like the apple.  Chickens evolved to be tasty because humans chose the plumpest, tastiest chickens, bred them together, and in return, chickens lead a life of relative safety and leisure, protected from foxes, the environment, steady source of food and mates, and guaranteed survival for their tasty young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s like the apple.  Chickens evolved to be tasty because humans chose the plumpest, tastiest chickens, bred them together, and in return, chickens lead a life of relative safety and leisure, protected from foxes, the environment, steady source of food and mates, and guaranteed survival for their tasty young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-10</guid>
		<description>The egg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Natalie seems to have answered one of your queries: a fancy name for chicken is poultry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natalie seems to have answered one of your queries: a fancy name for chicken is poultry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Az</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&quot;wings&quot;, &quot;nuggets&quot;, &quot;white meat&quot;, &quot;dark meat&quot;, &quot;quarter&quot;, &quot;half&quot;, &quot;drum sticks&quot;. You know I&#039;m talking about chicken even without calling it &quot;chicken&quot;. So there you go chicken got more than three names, which makes it more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;wings&#8221;, &#8220;nuggets&#8221;, &#8220;white meat&#8221;, &#8220;dark meat&#8221;, &#8220;quarter&#8221;, &#8220;half&#8221;, &#8220;drum sticks&#8221;. You know I&#8217;m talking about chicken even without calling it &#8220;chicken&#8221;. So there you go chicken got more than three names, which makes it more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-7</guid>
		<description>ok. so.. natural selection.. survival of the fittest.. i get your point.. BUT... for all you scienc-y people out there, i just have to say this.. chickens can not direct their own natural selection. even if they had the foresight to do such a thing, natural selection acts on mutations that produce favourable traits which are then selected for by having better chances of survival and therefore increased chances of reproductive success..
so even if a chicken could taste like a stink bomb, they would probably smell like one too, and what cock (forgive the pun) wants to make baby chickens with a smelly stink bomb chicken? would that really enhance their survival skills as a species? and that is assuming that chickens breed freely.. then come the humans who basically unnaturally select all the juicy meaty tasty super chickens that we all eat in mass quantities for lunch &amp; dinner, and thats after eating their ova (eggs) for breakfast . correct me if i am wrong, but there are no humans breeding stink bomb chickens.
why don&#039;t we just praise them for being so magically delicious? and as for the last question.. the ckicken came first.. it just so happened that all the dinosaurs shared our preference for this tasty poultry (especially KFC) and so they ate almost all of them, causing the few survivors to hang out in underground circles until they thought it was safe to resurface again.. little did they know just hooooow delicious they were and that we would breed them in captivity by the millions to satisfy our greedy bellies. but damn, nothing goes with a pitcher of beer quite like a steaming hot plate of honey garlic WINGS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok. so.. natural selection.. survival of the fittest.. i get your point.. BUT&#8230; for all you scienc-y people out there, i just have to say this.. chickens can not direct their own natural selection. even if they had the foresight to do such a thing, natural selection acts on mutations that produce favourable traits which are then selected for by having better chances of survival and therefore increased chances of reproductive success..<br />
so even if a chicken could taste like a stink bomb, they would probably smell like one too, and what cock (forgive the pun) wants to make baby chickens with a smelly stink bomb chicken? would that really enhance their survival skills as a species? and that is assuming that chickens breed freely.. then come the humans who basically unnaturally select all the juicy meaty tasty super chickens that we all eat in mass quantities for lunch &amp; dinner, and thats after eating their ova (eggs) for breakfast . correct me if i am wrong, but there are no humans breeding stink bomb chickens.<br />
why don&#8217;t we just praise them for being so magically delicious? and as for the last question.. the ckicken came first.. it just so happened that all the dinosaurs shared our preference for this tasty poultry (especially KFC) and so they ate almost all of them, causing the few survivors to hang out in underground circles until they thought it was safe to resurface again.. little did they know just hooooow delicious they were and that we would breed them in captivity by the millions to satisfy our greedy bellies. but damn, nothing goes with a pitcher of beer quite like a steaming hot plate of honey garlic WINGS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monique</title>
		<link>http://stoss.ca/wp/2007/bad-meat/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Monique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoss.ca/wp/?p=42#comment-6</guid>
		<description>****&quot;Pigs evolved about 6 million years ago in Europe&quot;.****
***&quot;Chicken evolved in the Middle Ages&quot;.***
**&quot;Around 5th century fall of the western Roman Empire&quot;.**
*&quot;Until the end of the 15th century&quot;.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>****&#8221;Pigs evolved about 6 million years ago in Europe&#8221;.****<br />
***&#8221;Chicken evolved in the Middle Ages&#8221;.***<br />
**&#8221;Around 5th century fall of the western Roman Empire&#8221;.**<br />
*&#8221;Until the end of the 15th century&#8221;.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

